Homepage » Media » Archive media releases » Archive 2016 » Media release

Contact

Noah Adamtey

Noah Adamtey
(Dr. Phil. Agr. & Envir.)

Department of International Cooperation
FiBL
Ackerstrasse 113
CH-5070 Frick

Phone +41 (0)62 865-7249
Fax +41 (0)62 865-7273
noah.adamtey(at)fibl.org

Contact

Franziska Hämmerli

Franziska Hämmerli
(lic. phil.)

Departement of Extension, Training and Communication
FiBL
Ackerstrasse 113
CH-5070 Frick

Phone +41 (0)62 865-7280
Fax +41 (0)62 865-7273
franziska.haemmerli(at)fibl.org

My newsletter account

Newsletter-Subscription


 Unsubscribe / Change your account information

Media release November 24, 2016

Organic farming in sub-Saharan Africa is productive, economically viable and resource-conserving

A long-term study in Kenya shows that maize yields and nutrient uptake in the organic farming systems are quite similar to conventional systems. Due to premium prices, organic systems are more profitable for farmers than conventional ones. The study was carried out by the Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL) in close cooperation with partners in Kenya.

Close-up of several large maize plants on a field with red soil and an irrigation hose. A sign in the ground displays the following details: "Treatment: Organic High; Crop: Maize (H513); Inputs: 96KG N/ha, 55Kg P/ha; Planting date: 12/4/2016."

One of the sixteen trial plots in Chuka. (Photo: FiBL, Franziska Hämmerli)

A group of people is standing in a plot of young maize plants. In the front, FiBL project leader Gurbir Bhullar is talking to the Kenyan researcher Anne W. Muriuki.

FiBL project leader Gurbir Bhullar (second person on the left) and the Kenyan researcher Anne W. Muriuki discuss the maize trial plot in Thika. (Photo: FiBL, Franziska Hämmerli)

(Frick, 24 November 2016) A recent publication in the journal "Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment" shows the results of maize-based conventional and organic farming systems over the first six years of two long-term field trials in Chuka and Thika in the central highlands of Kenya. Both farming systems were compared at input levels of commercial, export-oriented production (high) and at those of smallholder farmers (low). At each level, the farming systems were fertilized with the same amount of nitrogen and phosphorus, the conventional one with farmyard manure and mineral fertilizer, the organic one with compost, ash and rock phosphate. The researchers from FiBL and its Kenyan partners show that after a three-year conversion phase, crop yields from high-input organic systems were similar to those of high-input conventional systems in Chuka and Thika. Despite higher production costs, the profitability of organic farming reached 1.3 to 4.1 times the profitability of conventional systems after the fifth year of conversion to organic due to premium prices. In the low-input systems at Thika, sole maize cropping produced three times higher maize yield in conventional compared to organic, but, when intercropped with beans, the maize yields were similar.

The study also revealed that nutrient balances on both sites were negative in the low-input systems as well as in the conventional high-input system. So these systems are mining for soil nutrients. The positive balance found in the organic high-input system was due to the common practice of leaving crop residues in the field. Therefore, the study suggests revisiting the fertilizer recommendations for small-scale farmers to secure yields and for export-oriented farmers to improve management practices to conserve resources. The findings demonstrate that high-input organic farming is productive, economically viable, resource-conserving and can contribute to sustainable agricultural production in Kenya and the regions in sub-Saharan Africa that have environmental conditions similar to Chuka and Thika.

Further information

FiBL contact

Links

The FiBL long-term study in the tropics: SysCom

The study is part of the long-term Farming Systems Comparison (SysCom) programme (www.systems-comparison.fibl.org ). The SysCom programme compares agricultural production systems (primarily organic and conventional) in three tropical countries (Kenya, India and Bolivia) in order to increase knowledge about the potentials and limitations of organic farming.

Publication details

Productivity, profitability and partial nutrient balance in maize-based conventional and organic farming systems in Kenya. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Volume 235, 1 November 2016, Pages 61–79.
Available at http://authors.elsevier.com/sd/article/S0167880916304935

Partners

International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Kenya
Kenya Agricultural & Livestock Research Organization (KALRO)
Kenya Organic Agriculture Network (KOAN)
Kenyatta University
Kenya Institute of Organic Farming (KIOF)

Funding

The long-term study SysCom is financially supported by Biovision Foundation, the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, the Liechtenstein Development Service and the Coop Sustainability Fund.

Download

Media release (154 KB)
Media release (149 KB)
Picture 1 (1.8 MB)
Picture 2 (2.8 MB)